![]() We went to court, we felt like we put a lot on the line-our jobs, our Rights Watch on condition of anonymity, expressed her frustration with her (a pseudonym), an Aiken, South Carolina, Wal-Mart worker speaking to Human Their employees' basic rights with virtual impunity.And Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Their own obligation to respect workers' rights.It has allowed them, instead, to violate Law duty to protect workers' rights has opened the door for employers to breach States' failure to uphold its international The endemic extensiveĭelays in enforcement further undermine the efficacy of the already weak laws. To restore the status quo ante and imposing few, if any, economic consequences. To adequately deter employers from breaking the laws, only requiring offenders Tactics that interfere with worker organizing.They provide penalties too weak Meaningful and dissuasive penalties, and enforce the prohibitions.US labor law and practice do not Law requires countries to outlaw such conduct, sanction violators with Under international law, employers cannot mount aggressiveĪnd coercive anti-union campaigns that interfere with worker organizing or retaliateĪgainst workers for supporting a union. Important international instruments, the United States is legally bound to Member of the International Labour Organization (ILO) and party to several The right of workers to organize is well established under ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |